Advertisement
Peter wrote: I think the "push-pull" tendencies many Fours display in relationships is purely "personality" not "personality DISORDER."
And the underlying question, I suppose, is determining when a tendency crosses the line from personality trait to pathology. As a 4w5 who was once diagnosed with BPD (at the same time that I was also diagnosed with major depression AND bipolar NOS, so I'm not sure how accurate *any* of those diagnoses were), I noted with particular interest the apparent similarities between the description of the Four and the DSM-IV criteria for diagnosing BPD:
A pervasive pattern of instability of interpersonal relationships, self-image, and affects, and marked impulsivity beginning by early adulthood and present in a variety of contexts, as indicated by five (or more) of the following:
(1) frantic efforts to avoid real or imagined abandonment.
(2) a pattern of unstable and intense interpersonal relationships characterized by alternating between extremes of idealization and devaluation
(3) identity disturbance: markedly and persistently unstable self-image or sense of self
(4) impulsivity in at least two areas that are potentially self-damaging (e.g., spending, sex, Substance Abuse, reckless driving, binge eating).
(5) recurrent suicidal behavior, gestures, or threats, or self-mutilating behavior
(6) affective instability due to a marked reactivity of mood (e.g., intense episodic dysphoria, irritability, or anxiety usually lasting a few hours and only rarely more than a few days)
(7) chronic feelings of emptiness
(8) inappropriate, intense anger or difficulty controlling anger (e.g., frequent displays of temper, constant anger, recurrent physical fights)
(9) transient, stress-related paranoid ideation or severe dissociative symptoms
(see www.behavenet.com/capsules/...inepd.htm)
Oh, I'm also a psych major, so I may be looking for connections where none exists. Now if I could only find a way to use all of this knowledge to find and maintain a fulfilling relationship...
Denise
And the underlying question, I suppose, is determining when a tendency crosses the line from personality trait to pathology. As a 4w5 who was once diagnosed with BPD (at the same time that I was also diagnosed with major depression AND bipolar NOS, so I'm not sure how accurate *any* of those diagnoses were), I noted with particular interest the apparent similarities between the description of the Four and the DSM-IV criteria for diagnosing BPD:
A pervasive pattern of instability of interpersonal relationships, self-image, and affects, and marked impulsivity beginning by early adulthood and present in a variety of contexts, as indicated by five (or more) of the following:
(1) frantic efforts to avoid real or imagined abandonment.
(2) a pattern of unstable and intense interpersonal relationships characterized by alternating between extremes of idealization and devaluation
(3) identity disturbance: markedly and persistently unstable self-image or sense of self
(4) impulsivity in at least two areas that are potentially self-damaging (e.g., spending, sex, Substance Abuse, reckless driving, binge eating).
(5) recurrent suicidal behavior, gestures, or threats, or self-mutilating behavior
(6) affective instability due to a marked reactivity of mood (e.g., intense episodic dysphoria, irritability, or anxiety usually lasting a few hours and only rarely more than a few days)
(7) chronic feelings of emptiness
(8) inappropriate, intense anger or difficulty controlling anger (e.g., frequent displays of temper, constant anger, recurrent physical fights)
(9) transient, stress-related paranoid ideation or severe dissociative symptoms
(see www.behavenet.com/capsules/...inepd.htm)
Oh, I'm also a psych major, so I may be looking for connections where none exists. Now if I could only find a way to use all of this knowledge to find and maintain a fulfilling relationship...
Denise
posted by:
|
|
Unsubscribed |
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Re: Personality Traits vs. Personality Disorders
Sat, April 17, 2004 - 10:38 AMI tend to view the "Holy Bible of the DSM-IV" with a dose of skepticism/reality that tells me to remember that it tries to apply GENERAL criteria to SPECIFIC individuals. Besides, it's wise to view it all "in context." In "another life" I moderate a web community of 1800+ HSPs, many of whom are Fours, and many of whom bring a veritable smorgasbord of diagnoses to the table... which so often turn out to have been made "in isolation" during the three HMO mandated CBT sessions, which in NO way offer sufficient time to put eveything in its proper context. But I'm sure I'm not telling you anything new, there....
Since my ex was a Borderline, I am intimately familiar with the "pathological" end of the spectrum... and I guess the best way I can draw a line between BPD and merely "Fourish behaviour," would be to say that BPD is far more "openly destructive," while (unhealthy) Fours tend to be more SELF-destructive. Fours tend to be completely "self-referencing," while Borderlines are more "ambi-referencing."
Finally.... and please understand this is NOT intended as "finger pointing," nor am I implying this is YOU, nor am I criticizing Fours (actually, I love Fours)... but many Fours are "self-pathologizing." What I mean by that is that some Fours don't LIKE the idea that they are Fours (the phrase I hear a lot is "But it makes me sound like such a pathetic loser"), so they search for a pathology to explain what is-- essentially-- their core personality. It's always important to remember that there are no "good" or "bad" e-types... all the types really do is provide a framework for understanding and self-growth, regardless of type.
Of course, I should put this in context by pointing out that my personal philosophy is that society tends to overpathologize, assigning the term "disorder" to ANY and ALL things that don't fit within some very narrowly defined "norm." Frankly, I prefer an approach of "healthy, until proven ill."
--Peter
(showing the Nine trait of "talking in endless sagas") -
-
Re: Personality Traits vs. Personality Disorders
Sun, December 26, 2004 - 2:16 AMGreetings. New here. From what I've studied of the E., I was struck with Enneatype 2 as having the most potential BPD traits, particularly around the need for love (including attention, affection, time/energy spent) reflected from others back as a way to obtain self-validation. I'm left with a sense that low functioning type 2's resemble those with really poor coping abilities and an inability to self-love (thus making it just that much more necessary to obtain that love from others and sets up very dependent relationships where there are constant fears of abandonment). DSM-IV aside, I think personality disfunctions run a spectrum that could be layed on top of most any Enneatype. Complicate that with the idea that we all possess a certain degree of diagnosable personality disorder traits and it pushes it out the window just that much more. I'm always reminded that if the same personaluty trait gets in the way of social/personal functioning, and there has been no insight built into changing or modifing the behavior into a more healthy one, then it most likely falls into a personality disorder. -
-
Unsu...
Re: Personality Traits vs. Personality Disorders
Sun, December 26, 2004 - 11:16 AM>From what I've studied of the E., I was struck with Enneatype 2 as having the most potential BPD traits, particularly around the need for love (including attention, affection, time/energy spent) reflected from others back as a way to obtain self-validation.
well, remember that fours dis-integrate to 2, so there ya go.
as a four myself, i was interested to read Denise's list (thanx, denise) because even tho i have little of the 4s depressive characteristics, the tendency to"split" against myself is certainly there, and the list kind of puts a light on that. IOW, tho it may be a matter of degree between personality/pathology (wouldn't buddhism - and for that matter, the enneagram itself - say that ALL personality is pathology, in the sense that it's a construct?) the fact is, the traits are there, in us as human beings, and we all share propensities, however subtle or latent those may be.
so any time we acknowledge our own possibilities, we find the gamut of both disorder and transcendence....and that's what contemplating the enneagram is all about.
...which leads to a more compassionate regard for ourselves and each other as we live out and integrate the highs and lows of the wheel.
-
-
Re: Personality Traits vs. Personality Disorders
Sun, December 26, 2004 - 7:42 PMok... great discourse
a friend and myself used to always say that disorder goes beyond the enneagram in a sense that the enneagram defines the balance in each person for integration... so the tendencies are there but when the disorder is prominent... the enneagram goes out the window
myself, I see my number as a balancing point and notice my journey from dis-integration to integration and acknowledge my role in defining the journey...
I think the 2 - 4 dynamic enlightens this discourse but since I amd neither will not make definitive statements...
Lobo -
-
Unsu...
Re: Personality Traits vs. Personality Disorders
Sun, December 26, 2004 - 11:20 PMactually, lobo, the first enneagram book i read was naranjo's, which comes thru ichazo's oral-based teaching in chile, and that focused exclusively on disintegration.
i think riso popularized the healthy attributes, but it really struck me at the time that it was the path of DISintegration which really determined your type. how we look when healthy ultimately becomes a blend of all the numbers, because that's the way integration works, but also why it's much harder to type a healthy adult personailty. (even riso's test advises you to answer Qs based on how you would have answered as a child or teen, because we aree less integrated then, and the characteristics are more distinct.)
seeing your number as a balance point is an interesting way to put it, thanks for that. but what do you mean by 'when disorder is prominent enneagram goes out the window'? even riso's descriptions get pretty bleak..... -
-
Re: Personality Traits vs. Personality Disorders
Mon, December 27, 2004 - 6:13 AMI guess if the goal(?) is total integration of all numbers then total dis-integration would be the other extreme and also as diverse, not typable...
enneagram has been a useful tool for me... almost like psychic reading with others
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re: Personality Traits vs. Personality Disorders
Mon, April 25, 2005 - 4:05 PMIt's all based on biochemistry. Basically your levels (either High, Medium, or Low) of Norepinephrine, Dopamine, and Seratonin determine your personality type, and conesquently govern your paths (integration/disintegration, and the nine levels of health inherent in each type). Here's a link to a more detailed article:
www.enneagraminstitute.com/arti...a.asp
Hope that helps...
-Duardon
