Here are some words to describe how Mind, Heart, Body are, within 3 phases.
During each phase, one center will be leading, one following and one reconciling ...
One can use these descriptions to place oneself in each phase and get the sense of how it is ... then also recognize that in others perhaps

Body leading, mind following, heart reconciling
Mind is Not Knowing; Heart is Not Resisting; Body is Expressing, Not Holding Back

Heart leading, body following, mind reconciling
Mind is Understanding; Heart is Feeling; Body is Resting

Mind leading, heart following, body reconciling
Mind is Penetrating; Heart is Opening; Body is Intuiting

You will become attached to anything you wrap yourself in, science included. :)

I find it hard to believe that you a can sit there an accuse me of ignornace by basing my opinion on pseudo-science when EVERY SINGLE REBUTT you made is COMPLETELY ROOTED IN ASSUMPTION. "Due to the FACT that...and the FACT that...and this other FACT that I'm not willing to substantiate" I at least provided an article to try and articulate my "Essentialist Bullshit" opinion, and I never said it was a STUDY, I beleive I referenced it as an ARTICLE, since we're on the topic of semantic specificity. And while i respect (as a head type) your need for empiricism, i think you were missing my point.

YES THERE ARE DIFFERENT LEVELS OF HEALTH

I realize this, which is why the ARTICLE explained that if this were the case (Neurotransmitters corresponding to personality types) we would notice AS I STATED IN MY EXAMPLE WITH THE 1, that as they moved through the levels of health, and experience integration and disintegration, we see a change in chemical levels, and i recognize that society among other factors affect those levels, THANKS FOR AGREEING WITH MY POINT - THIS IS NO BULLSHIT PEOPLE DO YOU BELIEVE IN MODERN PSYCHOLOGY? IT'S CALLED "SEASONAL AFFECTIVE DISORDER" and it's one of many SCIENTIFIC EMPRICIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL "FACTS" that's floating around these things called "Universities", and has formed the basis for my "highly unfortunate" pseudo-science (although I do not place as much faith in "tangible fact" as you do, which you will read about later in this post). In fact I am in the process of writing a grant proposal to get funding to test the basis of that theory, i'm apparently THAT FUCKING IGNORANT.

I believe at one point computer science, neuroscience, physics (Hawking and his colleagues are espousing the existance of "Light Holes" for christ sake!) among other fields of study were all labeled "Pseudo-Science", but i find living in a world of possibility far more rewarding than limiting my perspective to hard empiricism, which is kind of a logical phallacy in and of itself considering you can't even prove you exist (what does the word "prove" even mean; according to Saussure/Derrida all signs are relative, and "prove" is just a human categorical reference for something that doesnt actually exist (it's a simulacrum), you've just fallen victim to "Logic" of Western Empirical thought. But you see? That's the state of affairs when you lock yourself into thinking that because YOU can see it and touch it it's ABSOLUTE - it clearly fucking isn't because the fucking earth is round.

At this point there is no point in having a discussion of ideas about the enneagram because we'd have to work our way back to the meaning or origin of life and contemplate/debate each "fact" that has ever been just to get to a point where we'd be able to agree on an understanding of what each of us "means" when we use a word or definition.

And what about illicit drugs? No rebutt? There is no difference between adderall and tweak (That research I HAVE done), they are both comprised primarily of amphetamine salts, and therefore have the same affect on the body (the only SOCIAL difference between the two is that Adderall is considered (again a fucking social label whatever that means) to be primarily an instrumental drug, and tweak is considered primarily recreational. So if you beleive that psychopharmacological innovations like adderall and prozac have some kinda of "magic" property that makes them different than illicit drugs, and that somehow, even despite all that correlation, that your mood isn't effected by levels of neurotransmitters in your body which these drugs can affect, then i simply have nothing more to say on the matter, i guess you just can't reason with unreasonable people.

So to conclude this irate rant, Descarte fucked up bad when he based his entire logical proof of the existance of god on an assumption by saying "I can conceive of 'perfection', therefore god must exist because he is perfect" Well that's what you're doing, taking everything that is socially/discursively accepted as "truth" with complete blind faith (ironically), and belting anyone else for trying to disagree with (or even hesitantly question) the dominant discourse of society.

-Duardon

P.S. - I disagree that depression isn't an objective biological instability, i mean shit you're trying to tell me that when you're depressed you are somehow stable or at least the same relatively stable that we prescribe to human "normality"? As a prolonged state, (and i emphasize prolonged here because I feel depression is a neccessary TEMPORARY state) how is depression advantagous to evolution?